Review



msd analyzer package  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc msd analyzer package
    a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average <t>mean</t> <t>square</t> <t>displacement</t> <t>(MSD)</t> (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).
    Msd Analyzer Package, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/msd analyzer package/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    msd analyzer package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Microtubule polarity determines the lineage of embryonic neural precursor in zebrafish spinal cord"

    Article Title: Microtubule polarity determines the lineage of embryonic neural precursor in zebrafish spinal cord

    Journal: Communications Biology

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06018-7

    a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average mean square displacement (MSD) (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).
    Figure Legend Snippet: a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average mean square displacement (MSD) (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).

    Techniques Used: CRISPR, Knock-In, Control, Comparison



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc msd analyzer package
    a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average <t>mean</t> <t>square</t> <t>displacement</t> <t>(MSD)</t> (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).
    Msd Analyzer Package, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/msd analyzer package/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    msd analyzer package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC msd discovery workbench analyzer and software package
    a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average <t>mean</t> <t>square</t> <t>displacement</t> <t>(MSD)</t> (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).
    Msd Discovery Workbench Analyzer And Software Package, supplied by Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/msd discovery workbench analyzer and software package/product/Meso Scale Diagnostics LLC
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    msd discovery workbench analyzer and software package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average mean square displacement (MSD) (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: Microtubule polarity determines the lineage of embryonic neural precursor in zebrafish spinal cord

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06018-7

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Maximal z-projection of 24hpf zebrafish spinal cord between somites 6–8, showing KIF16Ba (KIF16Ba-mCherry, magenta) and Sara endosomes (GFP-Sara CRISPR Knock in, green) colocalization. b Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio as a function of spindle-MT enrichment for control (gray, n = 61 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO (green, n = 18 NPs) datasets. Below, GMM clustering of KIF16Ba MO spindle-MT enrichment (DI = 77.8%) with symmetric (blue) and asymmetric (red) clusters. c Sum z-projection of a dividing KIF16Ba MO asymmetric NP (registered t = 75 s) showing Sara endosomes (mCherry-Sara, magenta) and spindle-MTs (GFP-DCX, green). Relative pole B Sara endosomes ratio and spindle-MT enrichment are indicated. Arrows show Sara endosomes symmetric inheritance between the poles (cell contours). a , c Scale bars, 5 μm. d Dynamic of Sara endosomes mean ratio (log scale) as a function of registered time in pole A for control asymmetric (blue; n = 21 NPs) and KIF16Ba MO asymmetric (red; n = 8 NPs) datasets. ANOVA comparison of Sara endosome mean densities as a function of registered time between pole B and pole A ( e ) or cell center and cell sides ( h ) for KIF16Ba MO asymmetric ( e ; n = 8 NPs, 1141 endosomes) and KIF16Ba MO combined datasets ( h ; n = 18 NPs, 1986 endosomes). f Weighted average mean square displacement (MSD) (weighted according to certainty, see methods) as a function of delay for control combined (blue line) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red line) datasets. Blue dashed line, quadratic fit of combined control dataset. Red dashed line, linear fit of KIF16Ba MO combined dataset. R², correlation coefficient (95% confidence). g Average percentage of Sara endosomes in the central spindle area as a function of registered time for the control combined (blue) and KIF16Ba MO combined (red) datasets. Black dashed line indicates departure. d , g , f Shades, relative standard error mean (RSEM).

    Article Snippet: Afterward, MSD analyzer package was used with a custom Matlab code to generate \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$MSD(t)=\langle (\varDelta {x}^{2})\rangle +\langle (\varDelta {y}^{2})\rangle$$\end{document} M S D ( t ) = ⟨ ( Δ x 2 ) ⟩ + ⟨ ( Δ y 2 ) ⟩ of each individual track (Fig. ; ).

    Techniques: CRISPR, Knock-In, Control, Comparison